And there will be many ‘experts’ who say that the speed of light is still not surmountable or that time is linear and it is not possible to do many of the things that I propose in these pages, I know. I offer this site to these people and say that the whole truth of what Black Ops and other real knowledge brokers are after is not under the control of NASA or the Smithsonian and other public or relatively transparent structures of academia and government. Here’s a site worth looking into that discusses some of the stuff that many have known about for a long time. It does not include the Catholic scholar/physicist who has reportedly developed a chronovisor along with input from Werner von Braun and Fermi that would be similar to something the Philosopher’s Stone could achieve ([http://www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/bpp/TM-107289.htm]).
“Father Pellegrino Maria Ernetti (1925-1994) was a Benedictine priest, scientist, and world authority on “archaic” music (pre-Christian to the 10th century AD). He claimed to have combined quantum physics with the occult to build a time machine: the chronovisor. Father Ernetti said that he had traveled to Rome in the year 169 BC. C. to witness a representation of the now lost tragedy Tiestes, by the father of Latin poetry, Quintus Ennius. He claimed to have used the chronovisor to see Christ die on the cross. Why would such a distinguished churchman have felt the need to invent such a story? Is the Vatican hiding the whole truth about the life and achievements of Father Ernetti? (one)
It is correct to say that there are many impressions of what the Philosopher’s Stone is or what The Philosopher’s ‘Great Work’ might really be. There have probably been some who consider themselves alchemists who have misled the general public about it at various times due to the Inquisitions just like it happened with another of the alchemist’s quests. I am referring in this case to the homonunclus or artificial man that was made by Thomas Aquinas and his mentor and former Dominican bishop Frater Albertus Magnus. They were almost as divinely inspired as Constantine in his response to the agents of the heresy trial they were about to face.
Personally, I’d give Constantine the Peabody Award for marketing as himself (a Mithras worshiper who was made divine by his sons at the time of his death in the pagan custom of the Roman Empire builders, who also killed many of his familiar in horrible ways at that juncture.) co-opted the teaching of Christ. It is my opinion that Christ was an alchemist just like his ancestors, including Solomon and Melchizedek. The intrigues are many to say the least. Today, most people still think there is truth to the lie that alchemists were hermits seeking to turn lead into gold, and yet that was the wish of utterly materialistic medieval kings and nobles. Alchemists like me have to live a hermit’s existence if they (like me) aren’t willing to sell out, but many of them are within the bowels of hegemony. They encouraged many fakirs to claim that they had the ability to do things they couldn’t.
Thomas Aquinas and Frater Albertus (much admired by one of the Illuminati founders – Goethe) said that their homonunclus was ‘the talking head of Jesus’. Now what could have really been what they did? I suggest that they were in the process of making a stone and had a way of predicting certain events that people like Edward Kelley did. It is said that he too had a stone and that possibly England’s greatest scholar (and spy), John Dee, believed in Kelley. But I think Aquinas and Magnus had the same thing that Kelley had: a magic stone or a skull. The skulls found in Mexico have an artificial relationship of many millennia in ancestor worship throughout the ages and all cultures have had some form of shamanism attuned through them.
I know this is not a complete answer and there is no way I can give a real complete answer in a few pages. The lies of those who hide knowledge are matched by the lies of those who seek or fear knowledge.